Consumer Protection Cases That Set Precedents

Published on May 21, 2025

by Yoav

Consumer protection laws aim to protect individuals from fraudulent or deceptive business practices and ensure fair treatment in the marketplace. These laws are constantly evolving, with new cases arising that set precedents for how businesses should operate to comply with consumer protection regulations. From landmark decisions to ongoing legal battles, this article will explore some of the most significant consumer protection cases that have shaped the landscape for businesses and consumers alike.Consumer Protection Cases That Set Precedents

What Makes a Case Set a Precedent?

Before delving into the specifics of notable consumer protection cases, it’s essential to understand what sets them apart from other legal rulings. A case that sets a precedent is one that establishes a new legal principle or interpretation of existing law that will be applied to future cases with similar circumstances. This legal principle becomes part of the body of law, shaping the way that future cases are decided.

In the world of consumer protection, these precedents often arise from lawsuits brought against large corporations that engage in deceptive or harmful practices. These cases can result in hefty fines, changes to business practices, and sometimes even criminal charges for the individuals responsible for the misconduct.

The McDonald’s Coffee Case: A Landmark Decision for Product Liability

In 1994, Stella Liebeck, a 79-year-old woman, sued McDonald’s after spilling hot coffee from the fast-food giant on her lap. Liebeck suffered third-degree burns, requiring extensive medical treatment, and sought $20,000 in damages. However, McDonald’s refused to settle, and the case went to trial.

The jury ultimately awarded Liebeck $200,000 in compensatory damages, but this amount was reduced to $160,000 because the jury found Liebeck partially at fault for her injuries. However, the jury also awarded Liebeck $2.7 million in punitive damages, citing McDonald’s willful and wanton disregard for the safety of its customers.

McDonald’s appealed the decision, and the case ultimately settled for an undisclosed amount. However, the case garnered widespread media attention and became a focal point for debates about product liability and consumer protection. The precedent set by this case would require businesses to exercise greater caution and responsibility in the products they offer to their customers.

The Deceptive Advertising Case of POM vs. Coca-Cola

POM Wonderful, a popular juice brand, waged a six-year legal battle against Coca-Cola over a deceptive advertising claim. In 2010, Coca-Cola launched a pomegranate and blueberry-flavored Minute Maid juice that contained less than 1% pomegranate juice and 0% blueberry juice. POM sued, arguing that Coca-Cola’s labeling and advertising were misleading and in violation of the Lanham Act, which prohibits false or misleading advertising that harms competitors.

The Supreme Court ultimately ruled in favor of POM, stating that labels must be viewed as a whole and can be misleading even if they meet the technical requirements of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. This ruling set a precedent for truth in advertising and placed a greater burden of transparency on companies.

The Ongoing Battle Against Wells Fargo’s Fraudulent Practices

In 2016, Wells Fargo was investigated by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) for creating millions of fraudulent bank and credit card accounts without customers’ knowledge or consent. The bank agreed to a $185 million settlement, the highest in CFPB history at the time, and faced multiple class-action lawsuits from customers that were affected by the scandal.

Since then, Wells Fargo has faced numerous investigations and lawsuits related to their unethical practices, resulting in significant financial losses, reputational damage, and changes in leadership. This case has become a prime example of the consequences businesses may face when they engage in fraudulent practices that violate consumer protection laws.

The Impact of Consumer Protection Cases

These are just a few examples of consumer protection cases that have set precedents, but there are countless others that have shaped the legal landscape for businesses and consumers. These cases serve as a stark reminder that businesses must uphold ethical standards and comply with consumer protection laws to avoid costly legal battles and damage to their brand.

As consumers become increasingly aware of their rights, the importance of upholding ethical business practices and providing transparent information to customers has never been more crucial. By understanding these cases and the precedents they set, businesses can ensure they operate within the bounds of the law and maintain trust with their customers.

In Conclusion

Consumer protection cases that set precedents serve as a vital reminder that businesses must prioritize ethical practices to avoid legal battles and safeguard their reputation. As laws continue to evolve, these cases serve as a foundation for how businesses should operate and treat their customers, promoting fairness and transparency in the marketplace.